Coding is automated, even a noob like me did it. I think the RA offers the most bang for your buck. It offers free programs that you would have to pay for with the Neptune and DA. The phone app is sweet, but that requires the wifi attachment (I ordered the RA and wifi, $370). I think that coding on the computer is lots easier than punching in buttons in the controller. My biggest complain with the RA is that I have it setup so that I can only mess with the programming via computer, my computer has been out of commission for a month now. Another thing is that my pH calibration keeps getting messed up.
I think the Neptune family products is really easy to program and intuitive to program. They have all the bells and whistles, and seem to be the most popular. If you're looking for budget controllers ,the Apex Jr. is a sweet deal. I was debating between this controller and the RA. The issue I had was that Neptune sells everything in modules (as do the others), but I would have been spending the same amount getting the Apex Jr up to par with the RA. I've never tried to get an Apex online, but can't imagine it would be too hard. I like the look of the Apex Jr as well.
I haven't messed with Digital Aquatics products, so I can't comment on their products.
I know the RA customer service is top notch, but I've heard good things about Neptune as well.
If all you want is to control the 6055, you can get the Tunze wave maker. I'm pretty sure both of the controllers have similar features though.
One more thing about the controllers, it matters which one you get if you decide to DIY some LEDs. Unless you get the switchable drivers, but the analog and PWM drivers will have to be matched up with the controller output signal (not hard, but can cause/save you headaches)
Hopefully I gave you some things to think about. Either one you choose there will be support here on the site to help you with.
You can save yourself some cash and go with an older model (ei. acjr). They offer most of the same features but are limited on their expandability.
Sent using Forum Runner